|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

sgt spike
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 13:35:00 -
[1]
christ is this thread still going ... or is it a new one guys its a canny setup but dont stick this ship together and think yer gonna be a pwn machine this setup is really only good against missile cruisers (or mining cruisers), and thats mainly because of the abII as it increases the speed (reducing missile damage) whilst keeping the sig size small (large sig radius = tons o damage from missiles).
this is not a good setup against cruisers toting guns or drones so beware of bull****
if you dont believe me check the ops kills on killboard.com
this isnt meant as a flame as the setup is a good idea, but as with all setups its horribly flawed against the wrong opponent
can you put a price on peace? |

sgt spike
|
Posted - 2006.02.28 20:56:00 -
[2]
Edited by: sgt spike on 28/02/2006 20:59:40
Originally by: Malka Badi'a Glad to hear it worked so well I have a slightly altered setup on the ship setups thread, experimental bleeder version of the punisher. Give that one a shot and let me know how it goes too?
The more first-hand experience I get from players, versus half-assed insults, the more I can improve upon this.
yet again i am pwned on the forums by malka ..... seriously i wasnt trying to flame i was trying to point out the flaws that are evident and say what the ship was good against as well as what it wasnt.
but really malka you would never (and i really mean that) get 'under my guns' in my cruiser, if you want to test that gimme a yell in game. believe me.
as far as pointing out the obvious... fair enough it may have been obvious to you but the odd newer player reads these forums looking for inspiration, and if you think a new player will set up that ship, go looking for a fight in lo sec and come up trumps then i think that despite what gets posted by your alts on this forum that you are sadly mistaken
the long and the short of it is that i do find this setup interesting and would like to see it work, but im not convinced
can you put a price on peace? |

sgt spike
|
Posted - 2006.02.28 21:46:00 -
[3]
Edited by: sgt spike on 28/02/2006 21:46:17
Originally by: Malka Badi'a Why would I choose to engage a target that is specifically setup to counter the tactics I have listed on an immediate situation? Not only could you counter it with slight module alterations but your battle tactics would change specifically to eliminiate the tactical strengths of my ship. There would be no point nor realistic test involved.
personally that wasnt the aim of the comment i wouldnt change the setup on my ship , its built to be adaptable, i will engage anything in it from battleships to frigates with only 2 exceptions ravens (cos they are nuts) and hacs because they are capable of doing everything a cruiser can do but better. the aim of the comment wasnt to 'call you out' or prove anything to the eve community it was merely to see an interesting setup in action against its preferred foe and to see if it works.
Originally by: Malka Badi'a You are are good guy, sgt, with decent piloting skills.
how do you know? i could be a horrible bastard who likes to post on forums but who only mines in game
can you put a price on peace? |

sgt spike
|
Posted - 2006.02.28 22:02:00 -
[4]
where and when have you seen me fight ? you must have been quick cos im either dead or picking up the loot in about 5 seconds, and i must reiterate my cruiser is not frigate specific
either way you arent gonna gimme a shot so i guess ill leave it there
can you put a price on peace? |
|
|
|